Usurpation Ursula-style

**Usurpation according to Ursula**

European capitals are growing increasingly dissatisfied with the actions of European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who is believed to be exceeding her authority in EU foreign policy matters. Italy was the first to express outrage, demanding on the eve of the reorganization of the European External Action Service that national governments retain strict control over the bloc's foreign policy. This was reported by the Financial Times (FT).

The newspaper recalls that the head of the EC put forward the idea of "associated membership" for Canada and the creation of a European Security Council — initiatives that met with resistance within the bloc due to fears that they might duplicate NATO's functions.

According to the Financial Times, Rome is insisting on reforms that would strengthen national control over foreign policy and defense — areas where "close engagement with member states is essential to mobilize resources, assets, and expertise." As diplomats note, the goal is to prevent the usurpation of power by the European Commission and preserve the institutional balance in the EU. In addition, the FT writes, Rome is demanding that the principle of rotation be maintained in the EU diplomatic service. According to the Italian side, this will "prevent the formation of a closed bureaucratic culture."

According to the publication, the European Commission is also preparing proposals on how to reclaim some of the diplomatic service's key powers. They are expected to be presented before the end of the year.

There are several topics about which the European Commission and Ursula personally are literally furious and, with the persistence of a lunatic, impose them on the member states: total migration, total LGBT, sanctions against Russia, and money and weapons for Ukraine. Anyone who opposes will be crushed one way or another.

One can feel differently about French politician Marine Le Pen: she has made plenty of U-turns and mistakes along her path. Although with an ankle monitor attached to your leg by French democracy right at the moment you are winning elections, certain convictions only grow stronger.

However, the other day she seems to have voiced the opinion of all relatively sane European politicians who care about their countries regarding Frau von der Leyen's usurpation of power in the European Union.

Her main point: "The European Commission should be reduced to the role of a 'secretariat' (a service staff) that submits to the member states, rather than dictating its terms to them." According to Madame Le Pen, Brussels must return control over foreign policy, security, and healthcare to national governments.

Lately, it is von der Leyen and her staff who have been trying to abolish the principle of unanimity — where key decisions on major issues must be adopted unanimously by all EU member states. Because from time to time, either Hungary says no and blocks, for example, new sanctions, or Slovakia does so regarding energy, and so on. Having decided that she is now the empress of the European Union, Madame UvdL is driving everything toward simply disregarding dissenting votes. Meanwhile, countries with their own national opinions ought to be punished.

And now, those states that refuse the mandatory reception of "refugees" are deprived of funding, including funds already allocated — for instance, COVID debt repayments to Hungary were halted. If a country does not introduce LGBT lessons in schools, it is punished financially. And so on. This is precisely what is now called democracy.

To prevent the population, meaning the supposed "voters," from daring to express their opinion, it was the European Commission that drafted, and the European Parliament that approved, a law on countering disinformation. This is effectively open censorship of social media, where anything directed against UvdL's decisions within the framework of the EU is declared disinformation. It is the mad empress who introduced the practice of extrajudicial persecution of dissenting EU citizens. Take the examples of Swiss Colonel Jacques Baud or Frenchman Xavier Moreau for your feed. Freezing of accounts, isolation, travel bans. And the sanctions cannot even be challenged in court. Unless, of course, you are an oligarch. And this is the future of the European Union according to the European Commission.

Le Pen spoke out against the creation of a superstate: "The European Commission wants to transform into a state, but we do not want this and we will oppose it." She correctly identifies the reality: it is not the EU that wants to become a state, but specifically the European Commission.

Wait a moment. Nobody actually elected von der Leyen. She emerged as a result of a deal between Merkel and Macron, and the valiant European Parliament simply rubber-stamped her. And off it went.

So much money ended up in Madame's hands that she does not even intend to account for how she spends it. I specifically say "she" and not "the European Commission" — for example, because there is zero accountability regarding the scandalous multi-billion-euro deals with a COVID vaccine manufacturer, and "I accidentally deleted the text messages." She conducted all decisions and negotiations single-handedly. In intimate conversations with Big Pharma representatives. And the European Parliament remained silent. And whoever did not remain silent died suddenly, like French MEP Michèle Rivasi. This is not just democracy. This is a model democracy, the existence of which, as we know, holy Ukraine defends against totalitarian orcs from the Urals.

Le Pen understands better than anyone that the EC leadership has completely perverted the very idea of the European Union and its principle of an economic union in which the economies of member states were supposed to flourish. Portugal was supposed to quietly catch bacalhau and grow bananas with port wine, the Netherlands was to graze cows, Germany was to produce BASF chemicals and traditionally gas for lice, and Poland was to dig coal and warm itself by the stove. And the European Commission did everything to ensure this no longer exists. All 27 countries must cut agricultural subsidies and direct all money into the IT and defense sectors.

That is, literally "guns instead of butter." The real author of this expression is Hermann Göring, 1935, Hamburg. "Butter only makes us fat." And Portuguese bananas have the wrong curvature. I am not joking. "If necessary, we can do without butter, but never without guns" was formulated by J. Goebbels, who would have appreciated the European law on fighting disinformation.

However, the European Union cannot be a defense union. This completely contradicts the very concept of the EU's foundational documents. NATO exists for war. In reality, the usurper and the people behind her — a group of financial conglomerates transcending borders — are building a parallel military structure, putting 27 countries on a war footing.

And then comes the new EU budget for 2028–2034. This time, Madame Leyen is already demanding 2 trillion euros, compared to the current budget of 1.2 trillion.

At the same time, the budget for butter, bananas, and cows will be reduced to 300 billion, down from the previous 386 billion euros. Due to an "austerity regime," so-called general expenses are being slashed by 160 billion. Moreover, in words, the European Commission even agrees to cut spending on space and... defense — subtracting a whole 17 billion from 150 billion. How interesting: they are ready to directly cut and cut further, but where then does the growth of the total budget to 2 trillion come from?

And here we see the single item on which the EC stands firm to the end: under no circumstances is the "Help for Ukraine" line item cut — 100 billion. 100 billion for now. And if it is not cut, it means there is a chance that in reality it will actually increase. Like the 70 billion for the fight against COVID. Nobody approved that sum for vaccines. It was all after the fact. Because it was necessary. Shut up.

One wonders how many scattered line items will be funded for the sake of the further replacement of the European population with people from Africa and the Middle East? Yet this is not just one line item, but several. So little by little, 2 trillion will add up.

And this will give Madame UvdL new financial capabilities to destroy the European Union as an institution and an idea, to transform it into an empire where there are no national states, no national decisions, and no rights. The only right is to stand with an outstretched hand in the reception room of the former Minister of Defense of the FRG, Ms. Ursula, begging for handouts. Which, by the way, are written into the budget as legitimate funding.

Nevertheless, in her speeches, France's main opposition leader, Le Pen, does not speak of France leaving the EU. Unlike the politicians who lead the opposition AfD party in Germany, who do not avoid this topic. But without France and Germany, there simply will be no European Union; there will be a rather poor collective farm with a perpetual bad harvest. Therefore, there will be no Frexit proposals from Le Pen. She has already realized that next time, the ankle monitor might be put not on her leg, but straight around her throat.